Assignment Help For You!

Special Offer! Get 20-30% Off on Every Order!

Posted: September 22nd, 2023

Submit a Problem-Focused SOAP note

Submit a Problem-Focused SOAP note here for grading. You must use an actual patient from your clinical practicum. Review the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded. Be sure to use the SOAP note template for your program and view the rubric associated with your program for details on how your assignment will be graded.

Psychiatric Mental Health NP Students

PMH- NP Template: PMHNP SOAP Note TemplateDownload PMHNP SOAP Note Template

PMH-NP Grading Rubric: PMHNP SOAP Note RubricDownload PMHNP SOAP Note Rubric

N682L-A SOAP Note Rubric

N682L-A SOAP Note Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeS (Subjective)

10 pts

Symptom analysis is well organized, with C/C, OLD CART, pertinent negatives, and pertinent positives. All data needed to support the diagnosis & differential are present. Is complete, concise, and relevant with no extraneous data.

Writing Effective Problem-Focused SOAP Notes
SOAP notes are a common documentation format used in healthcare to record a patient’s medical history and share information between providers (Hughes, 2008). The SOAP format organizes a note into four main sections: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. Of these sections, the problem-focused SOAP note places special emphasis on clearly identifying a patient’s chief complaint or problem in the Subjective section to guide clinical decision making and treatment planning. Well-written problem-focused SOAP notes are essential for effective communication, continuity of care, and quality patient outcomes. This article will discuss best practices for writing the different sections of a problem-focused SOAP note based on evidence from the literature.
Subjective Section
The Subjective section is where the patient’s chief complaint or problem is documented (Hughes, 2008). This section should concisely summarize relevant information from the patient’s history in a way that clearly identifies the main problem to be addressed. According to Taylor et al. (2016), key elements to include are:
Chief complaint (CC): A brief 1-2 sentence statement of the patient-identified problem in the patient’s own words.
History of present illness (HPI): A chronological summary of events leading up to the CC, including location, quality, severity, timing, context, modifying factors. Relevant negatives should be noted.
Review of systems (ROS): Pertinent positives and negatives related to the CC from a systems review. Extraneous details not related to the CC can be omitted.
Pertinent past medical, family, and social history: Only include histories relevant to understanding the CC.
Organizing the subjective data around the CC helps the reader quickly understand the patient’s main problem without getting lost in extraneous details (Taylor et al., 2016). Using the patient’s own words to describe the CC engages them and sets the focus for the note.
Objective Section
The Objective section documents the physical exam findings and relevant laboratory/diagnostic results pertinent to the CC (Hughes, 2008). Exam findings should be organized by body system and include both positive and negative findings. Only abnormal lab/test results directly related to evaluating the CC need be included. Irrelevant normal findings waste time and confuse the reader (Taylor et al., 2016). Objective data provides clinical evidence to consider in the assessment of the patient’s problem.
Assessment Section
In the Assessment section, the clinician analyzes the subjective and objective data to arrive at the most likely diagnosis or diagnoses related to the CC (Hughes, 2008). It is best to list diagnostic possibilities in order of decreasing likelihood when the diagnosis is uncertain (Taylor et al., 2016). The assessment considers both the patient’s main problem and important related issues or comorbidities uncovered during the history and exam. Well-supported assessments demonstrate clinical reasoning and set the stage for targeted treatment planning.
Plan Section
The Plan section outlines the treatment plan, goals, and follow up for the problems identified in the assessment (Hughes, 2008). Specific action items should include:
Diagnosis or diagnostic tests: Working/provisional diagnoses and any tests ordered to clarify diagnoses.
Treatment: Medical, surgical, rehabilitation, or referral plans. Short and long term goals stated in measurable terms.
Patient instructions: Education, medications, activity changes, follow up needs.
Follow up: Timeframe for reevaluation, pending results, subspecialty referrals (Taylor et al., 2016).
Well-defined plans demonstrate accountability and facilitate coordination of care. Including specific goals and follow up ensures the treatment plan’s effectiveness can be evaluated over time.
In summary, problem-focused SOAP notes provide a standardized format for clinicians to efficiently communicate a patient encounter with a focus on clearly identifying, assessing, and planning treatment for the patient’s main problem or chief complaint. Following best practices outlined here for each SOAP section supports comprehensive and coordinated patient care. With practice, healthcare providers can learn to write concise yet informative notes that optimize clinical decision making and quality of care.
Hughes, R. G. (2008). Patient safety and quality: An evidence-based handbook for nurses. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Taylor, C., Lillis, C., LeMone, P., & Lynn, P. (2016). Fundamentals of nursing: The art and science of nursing care (8th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Tags: ,

Order for this Paper or Similar Assignment Writing Help

Fill a form in 3 easy steps - less than 5 mins.

Why choose our Study Bay Services?

Like every student, Focusing on achieving the best grades is our main goal

Top Essay Writers

We have carefully cultivated a team of exceptional academic writers, each with specialized expertise in particular subject areas and a proven track record of research writing excellence. Our writers undergo rigorous screening and evaluation to ensure they hold relevant advanced degrees and demonstrate mastery of English grammar, citation style, and research methodology. Recent projects completed by our writers include research papers on topics such as sustainable energy policy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and molecular genetics.

Student-Based Prices

We prioritize attracting highly skilled writers through competitive pay and strive to offer the most cost-effective services for students. References from recent years include surveys of customer satisfaction with online writing services conducted by the American Customer Satisfaction Index between 2018 to 2022, demonstrating our commitment to balancing affordable costs with high standards of work through positive reviews and retention of expert writers.

100% Plagiarism-Free

We guarantee 100% original and plagiarism-free final work through a thorough scanning of every draft copy using advanced plagiarism detection software before release, ensuring authentic and high-quality content for our valued customers. To note, we also do not generate assignment content with AI tool, thus you a guaranteed 0% similarity index for your final research paper.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with ap.studybay, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a writer who has the unique qualifications to complete it, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and,the support and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.