Assignment Help For You!

Special Offer! Get 20-30% Off on Every Order!

Posted: September 4th, 2023

Evaluation Plan Project: Bar Coding in Healthcare

Case studies are valuable tools in academics as well as in professional practice. Case studies illuminate how products or services can be applied, or how innovation or disruption can be managed. Case studies enable learners and practitioners to apply critical thinking while finding ways to develop solutions to problems.
Much like travelers might apply the lessons learned from previous visitors to their own plans to visit destinations, case studies can help researchers and practitioners to develop plans, either by applying lessons learned from past shared experiences or by practicing analysis skills necessary to develop effective plans. Similarly, case studies can help those developing health information technology (HIT) evaluation plans by guiding their application of a specific evaluation model to their own plans.
In this, reflect on evaluation models you previously examined, select one for application to your selected case study, and compare this to other potentially applicable models.
To prepare:
• Select a case from chapters 6 through 12 of the Lorenzi text that will serve as the basis for your evaluation plan.
• To maximize your benefit from this project, consider selecting a case study that is relevant to a healthcare organization with which you are involved.
• Review the research models covered in the Week 2 Learning Resources.
• Consider the key points of each and when they would be the most appropriate choice for an evaluation of your selected case.
In a 3- to 4-page paper, address the following:
• Provide a brief, 1- to 2-paragraph summary of your selected case.
• Describe the model selected for your evaluation of the case study you selected.
• Justify your choice by comparing your selected model to at least three of the other models presented in this week’s reading.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. All papers submitted must use this formatting.
• Lorenzi, N. M., Ash, J., Einbinder, J., McPhee, W., & Einbinder, L. (Eds.). (2005). Transforming health care through informationLinks to an external site. (2nd ed.). Springer.
o Chapter 6, “Bar Coding: It’s Hard to Kill a Hippo” (pp. 65–68)
o Chapter 7, “Developing an Emergency Department Information System” (pp. 69–79)
o Chapter 8, “Implementation of OpChart in West Medical Building” (pp. 81–91)
o Chapter 9, “Development of the Scientific Computing Center at Vanderbilt University” (pp. 92–100)
o Chapter 10, “Early Implementation Problems of an Integrated Information Systems Within the White Mountain University Health System” (pp. 101–113)
o Chapter 11, “Implementation of a Web-Based Incident-Reporting System at Legendary Health System” (pp. 114–120)
o Chapter 12, “Managing Change: Analysis of a Hypothetical Case” (pp. 121–135)
Evaluation Plan Project: Bar Coding in Healthcare
The purpose of this paper is to develop an evaluation plan for a selected case study from the Lorenzi text, focusing on the application of a specific evaluation model. The chosen case study is “Bar Coding: It’s Hard to Kill a Hippo” from Chapter 6. This case study is relevant to healthcare organizations, as it discusses the implementation of barcoding technology to improve patient safety and reduce medication errors. The evaluation model selected for this case study is the Kirkpatrick Model, which will be compared to three other models from the Week 2 Learning Resources.
Summary of the Selected Case
The case study “Bar Coding: It’s Hard to Kill a Hippo” (Lorenzi et al., 2005, pp. 65-68) describes the challenges faced by a healthcare organization in implementing a barcoding system for medication administration. The goal of the system was to reduce medication errors and improve patient safety. However, the implementation process faced several obstacles, including resistance from staff, technical issues, and the need for extensive training. Despite these challenges, the organization was able to successfully implement the barcoding system and achieve its goals.
Selected Evaluation Model: Kirkpatrick Model
The Kirkpatrick Model is a widely used evaluation model that assesses training programs based on four levels: reaction, learning, behavior, and results (Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2006). This model is suitable for evaluating the case study because it allows for a comprehensive assessment of the barcoding system implementation, including staff training, changes in behavior, and the impact on patient safety and medication errors.
Comparison to Other Models
Logic Model: The Logic Model is a systematic and visual way to present the relationships among resources, activities, outputs, and outcomes of a program (W.K. Kellogg Foundation, 2004). While this model can be useful in understanding the overall structure of the barcoding system implementation, it does not provide a detailed evaluation of the training and behavioral changes required for successful implementation.
CIPP Model: The Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) Model is an evaluation model that focuses on evaluating programs based on their context, inputs, processes, and products (Stufflebeam & Zhang, 2017). Although the CIPP Model can provide valuable insights into the implementation process, it does not specifically address the training and behavioral aspects that are crucial for the success of the barcoding system.
RE-AIM Framework: The RE-AIM Framework evaluates interventions based on five dimensions: reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (Glasgow et al., 1999). While this framework can be helpful in assessing the overall impact of the barcoding system, it does not provide a detailed evaluation of the training and behavioral changes required for successful implementation.
In conclusion, the Kirkpatrick Model is the most appropriate evaluation model for the selected case study, as it allows for a comprehensive assessment of the barcoding system implementation, including staff training, changes in behavior, and the impact on patient safety and medication errors. By comparing the Kirkpatrick Model to other evaluation models, it is evident that this model provides the most detailed and relevant evaluation for the case study.
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1322-1327.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Lorenzi, N. M., Ash, J., Einbinder, J., McPhee, W., & Einbinder, L. (Eds.). (2005). Transforming health care through information (2nd ed.). Springer.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Publications.
W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic model development guide. W.K. Kellogg Foundation.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Order for this Paper or Similar Assignment Writing Help

Fill a form in 3 easy steps - less than 5 mins.

Why choose our Study Bay Services?

Like every student, Focusing on achieving the best grades is our main goal

Top Essay Writers

We have carefully cultivated a team of exceptional academic writers, each with specialized expertise in particular subject areas and a proven track record of research writing excellence. Our writers undergo rigorous screening and evaluation to ensure they hold relevant advanced degrees and demonstrate mastery of English grammar, citation style, and research methodology. Recent projects completed by our writers include research papers on topics such as sustainable energy policy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and molecular genetics.

Student-Based Prices

We prioritize attracting highly skilled writers through competitive pay and strive to offer the most cost-effective services for students. References from recent years include surveys of customer satisfaction with online writing services conducted by the American Customer Satisfaction Index between 2018 to 2022, demonstrating our commitment to balancing affordable costs with high standards of work through positive reviews and retention of expert writers.

100% Plagiarism-Free

We guarantee 100% original and plagiarism-free final work through a thorough scanning of every draft copy using advanced plagiarism detection software before release, ensuring authentic and high-quality content for our valued customers. To note, we also do not generate assignment content with AI tool, thus you a guaranteed 0% similarity index for your final research paper.

How it works

When you decide to place an order with ap.studybay, here is what happens:

Complete the Order Form

You will complete our order form, filling in all of the fields and giving us as much detail as possible.

Assignment of Writer

We analyze your order and match it with a writer who has the unique qualifications to complete it, and he begins from scratch.

Order in Production and Delivered

You and,the support and your writer communicate directly during the process, and, once you receive the final draft, you either approve it or ask for revisions.

Giving us Feedback (and other options)

We want to know how your experience went. You can read other clients’ testimonials too. And among many options, you can choose a favorite writer.